Resolving Conflicts between Multiple Competing Agents in Parallel Simulations

نویسنده

  • Paul Richmond
چکیده

Agents within multi-agent simulation environments frequently compete for limited resources, requiring negotiation to resolve ‘conflict’. The negotiation process for resolving conflict often relies on a transactional or serial processes that complicates implementation within a parallel simulation framework. This paper demonstrates how transactional events to resolve competition can be implemented within a parallel simulation framework (FLAME GPU) as a series of iterative parallel agent functions. A sugarscape model where agents compete for space and a model requiring optimal assignment between two populations, the stable marriage problem, are demonstrated. The two case studies act as a building block for more general conflict resolution behaviours requiring negotiation between agents in a parallel simulation environment. Extensions to the FLAME GPU framework are described and performance results are provided to show scalability of the case studies on recent GPU hardware.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Resolving Student-Parents Conflicts through the Improvement of Moral and Spiritual Intelligence

Resolving conflicts between students and their parents could lead to improvements in academic achievement. As a result, ways of helping with such an outcome are of significance. It can be hypothesized that improvements in moral and spiritual intelligence could lead to such resolutions. To explore this relationship, from among 450 high school students selected randomly, a group of 90 students wi...

متن کامل

Explaining the Increasing Tolerance Threshold for Resolving Marital Conflicts with the Moderating Role of Religious Teachings (Case Study in a Military Unit)

Introduction: Family is established by the marriage contract. The emotional and rational health as well as the authority of the family depend on the members benefiting from insight and knowledge necessary to prevent deviations. Objective: This study aimed to determine the effect of increasing the tolerance threshold in solving marital conflicts with the moderating role of religious teachings. M...

متن کامل

Comparing a Voting-Based Policy with Winner-Takes-All to Perform Action Selection in Motivational Agents

Embodied autonomous agents are systems that inhabit dynamic, unpredictable environments in which they try to satisfy a set of time-dependent goals or motivations in order to survive. One of the problems that this implies is action selection, the task of resolving conflicts between competing behavioral alternatives. We present an experimental comparison of two action selection mechanisms (ASM), ...

متن کامل

Ethics Conflicts in Rural Communities: Allocation of Scarce Resources

Allocation of scarce resources is a reality for health care professionals and organizations. Resource allocation issues can be particularly challenging for rural communities, where resources are not enough to meet all needs and fewer alternatives exist to resolve conflicts between competing needs. In addition, the ramifications of decisions may be more visible in the rural setting. Decisions re...

متن کامل

Modeling Conflict Resolution Dialogs Between Believable Agents

In this paper, we discuss how conflicts between believable agents can be modelled, and how dialogues aimed at resolving these conflicts can be simulated on a machine. To support our analysis, we consider an example of doctor-to-patient interaction, in which several sources of conflict exist, and where emotion and personality factors play a crucial role.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014